The NGO Delegation's Communiqué for the 50th UNAIDS PCB Meeting is already out. The Communiqué contains the following sections: Report of the Executive Director; Report of the Chair of the Committee of Cosponsoring Organisations; Follow-up to the thematic segment from the 49th PCB meeting; Leadership in the AIDS Response; Unified Budget, Results and Accountability Framework (UBRAF) 2016-2021; Indicator matrix for the 2022-2026 UBRAF and indicators, milestones, targets and data sources for the 2022-2023 Workplan and Budget; Update on strategic human resources management issues; Statement by the Representative of the UNAIDS Staff Association (USSA); Independent Organisational Oversight Reports and Management Response; and Thematic Segment – “Positive Learning: harnessing the power of education to end HIV-related stigma and discrimination, empower young people, and provide a comprehensive HIV response”
You may download the PDF version of the Communiqué (with photos from the hybrid PCB meeting) here.
Aleksey Lakhov, Europe Delegate
The 50th PCB meeting was marked by significant changes in the structure of UNAIDS, including those related to the continuous underfunding of the Joint Programme, the war in Ukraine, which affects not only the region of Eastern Europe and Central Asia, but the whole world, and calls for donors on increasing funding for the global response to HIV/AIDS.
The NGO Delegation was renewed almost completely before this meeting, accepting seven new delegates into its ranks. Thanks to the support of "senior peers" and the CCF, they were able to get up to speed and get involved in an active discussion of decision points in the drafting rooms.
The work on the latter required dedication and attentiveness on behalf of the delegates, but their perseverance paid off: a number of the Delegation's proposals were included in the Decisions document of the 50th PCB meeting. The decisions themselves were reached by consensus, which was a great merit of the chair – the representative of Thailand, the country that will host the 51st PCB meeting in December 2022.
One of the decision points of the 50th PCB meeting concerned the creation of an informal inclusive task team on options for resolving the immediate funding crisis for the 2022-2023 biennium. One of the NGO Delegation representatives will form an integral part of this team.
Agenda 1.3: Report of the Executive Director
The report of the Executive Director Winnie Byanyima was focused on the wider and challenging context facing the global AIDS response, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the war in Ukraine and other humanitarian crises, and the global economic downturn, on how UNAIDS is seeking to address this rapidly-changing reality, on the financial outlook for UNAIDS, on the transformation process currently underway for UNAIDS.
The Executive Director made a special mention of an overall slowing of progress in reducing new HIV infections globally and more regions with growing HIV epidemics, of the particular vulnerability of key populations in the context of crisis, as well as of surges of gender-based violence, forced and child marriages and teenage pregnancies caused by COVID-19.
The NGO Europe intervention was centred around the ongoing war in Ukraine and its devastating effect on the communities in the region. It was noted that this war will have far-reaching consequences for the whole Eastern Europe and Central Asia region.
In addition, the issue of the adoption of the Global Health Sector Strategy on HIV, Viral Hepatitis and STIs was raised. Specifically, it was mentioned that there was a lot of debate about the language of this Strategy, and that only 61 countries voted for it.
Agenda 1.4: Report of the Chair of the Committee of Cosponsoring Organisations
Charanjit Sharma, Asia and the Pacific Delegate
The CCO's report was appreciated, and the Co-Sponsoring Organisations were thanked for their hard work. These actions initiated are to be of the highest priority and a transversal, cross-cutting agenda fundamental to end AIDS, given that talking about HIV implies ending inequalities, as stated in the Global AIDS Strategy. And, for that, we celebrate the Global Strategies Initiative being implemented by the CCO. We have seen the added value of the Co-sponsors in HIV programmes especially in countries where UNAIDS offices no longer exist. We have seen Co-sponsors engaging more with the key and priority population communities and bringing their voices to the government. However, the work of the Joint Programme and the Co-sponsors is currently underfunded.
UNAIDS sets an example of good participatory practices in decision-making processes, for which a weak Joint Programme will send a wrong message to programmers and communities around the world, not being able to put up with the same commitments required at regional and in country levels to end AIDS.
It was highlighted with regards to stigma and discrimination of people living with HIV, women and girls and key populations, the in-country presence of the Joint Programme is essential to “assess and scale innovative policies and practices on the path to removing punitive and discriminatory laws, including criminalisation”. Therefore, highlighting the importance of diversifying funding resources to sustain and strengthen UNAIDS and the HIV response worldwide. This is detrimental to the Joint Programme and poses a threat to the HIV response.
Last but not the least, the principle of GIPA and ‘nothing about us without us’, and that the HIV-response must meaningfully involve civil society, key and priority populations and impacted communities.
Agenda 2: Follow-up to the thematic segment from the 49th PCB meeting
Jumoke Patrick, Latin America and the Caribbean Delegate
Data and technology are fundamentally important to the global HIV response especially when linking persons to care and ensuring we reach the people where they are with treatment and care services. The PCB and presenters wanted the decision points to reflect and support the need for timely, accurate and disaggregated data to properly understand and use the data for region- and country-specific programmes. Furthermore, streamlining data was found to be very important.
The NGO delegation along with some member states had strong concerns whether countries are building sufficient protections into data systems especially for those communities that are marginalised and criminalised. Central to the discussions on the board floor was the need for the PCB to recognise that data protection and the privacy of people living with HIV and key population groups should be embedded in regional and national responses for communities. Likewise, security and data protection are important, especially in countries that still outlaw same-sex relationships and countries that continue to demonstrate high levels of stigma and discrimination toward people living with HIV.The NGO delegation, through its consultations and advocacy at the PCB, was supported by the rest of the PCB when proposing additions to the decision points referencing data protection policies. The NGO Delegation believes that these policies will enhance and support protection for those persons living with HIV and those members of communities that are marginalised, vulnerable and in need of protection.
Agenda 3: Leadership in the AIDS response
Cecilia Chung, North America Delegate
UNAIDS Programme Coordinating Board invited the leadership of Global Fund, Peter Sands and the newly appointed U.S. global AIDS coordinator of PEPFAR, Dr. John Nkengasong to address the board on the state of global AIDS response.
Both Peter Sands and Dr. Nkengasong spoke about the importance of a fully replenished Global fund and a fully funded UNAIDS. The NGO delegation took this opportunity to highlight the unfinished business in U.S. with the Supreme Court setting the sexual and reproductive rights 50 years back and the continues discrimination against trans people. The 2025, 2030 and 10/10/10 goals would be meaningless if the leadership and member states do not push harder for changes.
Agenda 4: Unified Budget, Results and Accountability Framework (UBRAF) 2016-2021
Mubanga Chimumbwa, Africa Delegate
The 50th PCB meeting was held in hybrid both in person and virtually after 2 years of COVID-19 pandemic. And one of the critical reports is the financial report for 2016-2021 implementation period. The report shows that the UNAIDS Joint Programme is facing financial challenges despite the commitments made in the past years. There is significant evidence that the UNAIDS Joint Programme is underfunded with an estimation of $25 million under the lower approved threshold of the current UBRAF.
The report also shows that the UNAIDS Joint programme is losing about $12 million in the market exchange rate per year. It is very unfortunate that the funding trends are troubling especially at this critical moment, with COVID-19. The biggest implication is that without fully funded UNAIDS Joint Programme, the Global Fund and other HIV programmes at country level will not achieve its intended targets in bridging the gaps of communities, key populations adolescent and young women.
Agenda 5: Indicator matrix for the 2022-2026 UBRAF and indicators, milestones, targets and data sources for the 2022-2023 Workplan and Budget
Christian Hui, North America Delegate
The NGO Delegation integrated the feedback of people living with HIV, members of key and priority populations, and civil society from the North American region and global civil society consultation, in their intervention.
The NGO Delegation’s proposed two decision points were accepted. Some of the feedback provided included: The first decision point applauded the engagement of civil society evaluation experts in the UBRAF working group and recognized the Joint Programme for their technical expertise in developing a monitoring and evaluation framework. The second decision point highlighted that a fully-funded UBRAF, the UNAIDS Secretariat, and the Joint Programme is essential to support UNAIDS and the Joint Programme in meeting the new UBRAF indicator matrix targets, as well as contribute to the reaching of the Global AIDS Strategy 2021-2026 targets. In particular, focus should be placed in adequately funding community-led monitoring and youth-led responses.
Through lobbying efforts, both US and Canada included the need for community-led data collection and addressing the systemic and structural inequalities facing young women and girls in Africa, along with Black, Indigenous and People of Colour globally in their interventions.
Agenda 6: Update on strategic human resources management issues
Gastón Devisich, Latin America and the Caribbean Delegate
The report presented at the 50th PCB Meeting addressed the current Human Resources situation in UNAIDS. The NGO Delegation, Co-Sponsors and the MS acknowledged the dedication and flexibility of the staff and agreed that the new organisational structure and the matrix management and the decentralisation of functions will contribute to increase efficiencies and cost savings without hampering effectiveness. A process that should carry on with a gender and diversity-centred approach. However, without a fully funded UBRAF, the Joint Programme and critical support to the HIV response will be severely weakened or even cease to exist.
The NGO Delegation also highlighted that trust between Senior Management and UNAIDS staff needs to be fully restored. The USSA reported that the staff had felt that there was not sufficient engagement and information on their part on the effects of the realignment, which significantly affected the staff wellbeing. With this becoming a significant change management challenge, the PCB would welcome updates on what strategies are being put in place to address this issue.
The Joint Programme has always been proud of the comprehensive involvement of all stakeholders in all decision-making processes, and this must include its staff as well. Nonetheless, transformative cultural change will take time and only with a strong, dedicated, safe, transparent and responsive, fully funded-UNAIDS will we be able to fulfil the commitments of the Global AIDS Strategy.
Agenda 7: Statement by the Representative of the UNAIDS Staff Association (USSA)
The USSA Statement at the 50th PCB meeting continues to raise concerns and issues affecting the staff at UNAIDS at the Secretariat and those staff in regions and countries worldwide. Whether issues and challenges arise from the COVID pandemic, the realignment process, funding shortfalls and concerns and fears regarding management's ability to handle the challenges effectively.
It is important to note that commendation was given to the UNAIDS management for putting in place many measures towards improving UNAIDS’ organisational culture and preventing and addressing harassment, including providing a staff counsellor while acknowledging that more can be done.
The NGO delegation recognized that for many PCB meetings the issues that came up in the USSA statements are recurring and based on the report doesn’t seem to share a viewpoint that positive changes or a better working relationship are being fostered for a better and more productive UNAIDS. This was quite concerning for the NGO delegation who as a group of people depends on the collaborative partnership with both staff and management of UNAIDS to make its work for the people living with and impacted by HIV impacting.
Both (Management and Staff) must be more open to resolving issues while holding each other accountable for UNAIDS. One that will improve staff morale and confidence, and address injustices & inequalities, so that together they can make powerful moves in the HIV response and as we implement a progressive Global AIDS Strategy.
Agenda 8: Independent Organisational Oversight Reports and Management Response
Midnight Poonkasetwattana, Asia and the Pacific Delegate
Four organisational oversight reports were presented and discussed. The NGO Delegation welcomed all the reports, highlighting the positive developments and encouraging initiatives taken up to address staff grievances, though noted that the Global Staff Survey showed a low percentage of staff confidence that they would not face adverse consequences if they reported a case of abusive conduct.
The NGO Delegation suggested to fast-track the long-outstanding recommendations from the internal audit, and UNAIDS senior management team ensures sustainable funding for its core programmes, that human rights indicator to be included in the new UBRAF.
The NGO Delegation would also like to see improvement in staff confidence that they would not face adverse consequences if they reported a case of abusive conduct in the next Global Staff Survey.
Agenda 10: Thematic Segment – “Positive Learning: harnessing the power of education to end HIV-related stigma and discrimination, empower young people, and provide a comprehensive HIV response”
Iwatutu Joyce Adewole, Africa Delegate
The 50th thematic segment was timely considering the continued underfunding and challenges that youth-led organisations and initiatives face.
It opened with a powerful keynote speech from Yana Panfilova who made the case for adolescents and young people affected by the crisis in Ukraine and other humanitarian settings. The session included young panelists from America, Asia and Africa regions Ralph, Joyce, Erika and Elena. These young speakers represent the different constituencies of young people. They discussed the challenges around youth leadership, funding, comprehensive sexuality education and young key populations and also the enrollment of girls in school.
In the intervention done by the NGO Delegation, we emphasised on the need of making school safer for adolescents and young people in all their diversity, eliminating stigma, discrimination and violence in school settings, promoting and full implementation of comprehensive sexuality education for both in school and out of school young people and with emphasis on making young people co-leaders and equal partner in the AIDS response. Another intervention delivered by the NGO Delegation highlighted the importance of strengthening youth-led response, peer education to enhance the intersectional approach of youth-led response.
Tags: 50th PCB Meeting
Delivered by Iwatutu Joyce Adewole, Africa, during the second panel of the Thematic Segment "Positive learning: harnessing the power of education to end HIV-related stigma and discrimination, empower young people and provide a comprehensive HIV response"
I am a young disabled woman from Africa. If I were in Canada or the USA, I would be a young black immigrant woman with a disability. This tells that everywhere in the world, young people embody multiple intersecting, marginalized and overlapping identities that increase their vulnerabilities. School, next to their home, is supposed to be the safest place for adolescents and young people. Sadly, the school stands as a place where many of us face inequalities, human rights violations, and continuous stigma and discrimination. Covid-19 showed the world the realities of the widening inequality gap in the educational system in Africa and the disparities which exist within the rest of the world.
How do we break down HIV-related stigma and discrimination without sharing knowledge of the proper responses? How do we address the rising epidemic with ignorance standing in the way? The answer is simple; we can’t.
Formal and informal education with innovative approaches will play a vital key role in addressing these inequalities and shrinking the inequality gap, thereby reducing HIV transmission and HIV-related stigma and discrimination. What matters is giving young people access to inclusive education and ensuring a qualitative education through good measurement techniques and holding the government accountable for its commitments. Information remains a critical tool, and it is essential to maximize it. The focal point of CSE is to provide adolescents and young people with well-rounded information that extends beyond head knowledge and practical applications of what they have learned. We believe that with the proper learning, they will understand themselves better both physically and mentally, develop “respectful social and sexual relationships”, and make their individual choices conscious of how they affect themselves and others.
Today’s young people must be at the front and center of the response for large-scale global change, to drive conversations and actions and end the epidemic. We must be seen as Co-leaders in the AIDS response, Youth engagement must be fostered by actively listening to youths in the process of leading discussions and the decision-making processes, it must be adequately and sustainably funded and given resources to thrive. The doors must be thrown open for teachers and students living with HIV. This is a start to building back better and demolishing the walls of exclusion and discrimination come crashing down.
Delivered by Gastón Devisich, Latin America and the Caribbean, during the first panel of the Thematic Segment "Positive learning: harnessing the power of education to end HIV-related stigma and discrimination, empower young people and provide a comprehensive HIV response"
The intervention of the NGO Delegation at this very panel is about the value of peer-education. We often conceive it as an approach to health promotion, but it is so much more than that. It addresses the many expressions of stigma, bolsters one’s confidence and empowerment and provides a sense of belonging to many, for the first time in their lives. Peer-education is a double process: it enables you to do much more than just transfer capacities, it allows you to also catalyze emerging needs from your community.
In this matter, youth-led organizations face particular challenges throughout their life cycles. Meaning that once a young person reaches a certain age, you have to leave your organization for an adult-led one in order to continue your own personal path and make room for newer generations to speak up for themselves. It is not enough to have been young to understand today’s youth. For this reason, the growth, transitions and transformations of youth and youth-led organizations create great instability among youth-led organizations, as people come in, get to receive proper training and then have to leave, taking that symbolic capital with them.
If we want young people and adolescents to have a meaningful involvement in the HIV response, we need to support them in regards to peer-education. For youth to lead, we not only have to fund them and include them in decision-making, implementation and evaluation processes. We need to provide them with capacity building opportunities in order for them to develop their own sustainable training mechanisms and processes. This will allow youth to be able to exercise their autonomous voice and enhance an intersectional dialogue that can strengthen the history of youth-led response.
Delivered by Midnight Poonkasetwattana, Asia and the Pacific, on behalf of the NGO Delegation
Thank you chair,
I speak on behalf of the NGO Delegation, and wish everyone a Happy Pride Month.
There have been positive developments and encouraging initiatives taken up to address grievances at the workplace. It is laudable to learn that the majority of staff at UNAIDS completed training courses on Prevention of Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (PSEA) as well as courses on ethics and integrity and preventing fraud & corruption.
It was very interesting to learn about the Independent External Oversight Advisory Committee (IEOAC) observations and advice to the PCB and the Executive Director, with a view to strengthening governance and oversight within UNAIDS.
We suggest that:
Please note that the external auditor found that some indicators of UBRAF 2016-2022 were not recorded consistently, including one indicator related to a human rights related indicator. This was not addressed in any of the UBRAF reports, so we need to make sure that the new matrix will address issues found by the external auditor.
We are delighted that an Independent Ethics Office has been established and the head of the Ethics Office is now in place. Sufficient resources and support to the Ethics Office are needed – otherwise there comes a time when the office consists of only one person which may not be enough to effectively deal with the breadth and depth of the work required.
The Joint Inspector Unit (JIU) recommended that consideration is given to “how to best support the office with appropriate staffing and/or backup". We hope that PCB, UNAIDS Executive Director and Secretariat will ensure that the Ethics Office has adequate resources to carry out its functions.
The NGO Delegation would like to know what measures are in place to protect staff from retaliation because this is critical for ensuring that UNAIDS is a safe workplace. The 2020 Global Staff Survey showed that only 37% staff members reported confidence they would not face adverse consequences if they reported a case of abusive conduct. We hope that this percentage will improve in the next Global Staff Survey.
Delivered by Jumoke Patrick, Latin America and the Caribbean, on behalf of the NGO Delegation
Thank you, Chair. I am speaking on behalf of the NGO Delegation.UNAIDS is in its 25th year as a committed and strong global advocacy movement that puts people first, that puts people at the centre of its operation and people first to carry out its mandate as a progressive global change agent. For this reason, I am disheartened to hear another Staff Association report where there remains a troubling low level of trust between staff and senior leadership. Without a doubt as a delegation, we understand that currently, UNAIDS sits on uneasy ground with a global pandemic, humanitarian crisis, budget cuts and an alignment process occurring at the same time which is all causing destabilisation and uncertainty. Yes, we are in difficult times and such a time calls for leadership and transformation that will come at a cost for many, but never should it be at a cost to the people driving the response and the people central to the effectiveness of the responseWe have noted and seen improvement within UNAIDS in the engagement and frequency of which staff are engaged in different processes and congratulate the senior leadership for recognizing that communication is key to the process and that the fit for purpose and realignment process being undertaken won’t be successful if engagement and communication processes are not embedded in the practices and procedures moving forward with the staff of UNAIDSWe have a perfect opportunity NOW to collaborate better to make UNAIDS the change agent for the people we serve. This process is bigger than the Senior Leadership and the leadership of the staff association. This moment and this entire joint programme are for the People who continue to live in danger, the people who continue to be criminalised, the people who continue to have unequal access to treatment AND those who are yet to even see the benefit of a UNAIDS in their country. Looking ahead, we hope that the staff association and the UNAIDS management can find common grounds and better transparent engagements. The hard work of the staff is very much noted and has impacted many and we acknowledge both (Management and Staff) have the good of UNAIDS at heart, to improve staff morale and confidence, to address injustices & inequalities, conflicts and to show US the people living with and impacted by HIV that together they can make powerful moves in the HIV response and as we implement a progressive Global AIDS Strategy.
Show more posts