Decisions

19: Next PCB Meeting

Decisions6 April 2012 by Amy Coulterman[PDF][print]

The PCB recommended that its next meeting take place on 28 and 29 June 1999 in Geneva.

18: Migration and HIV/AIDS

Decisions6 April 2012 by Amy Coulterman[PDF][print]

The PCB welcomed the background paper and reaffirmed their strong interest in the thematic area of Migration and HIV/AIDS. It recommends:

18.1 That future work should emphasize the importance of protecting the rights of migrants (to work, to health, to other social services, non-discrimination and so forth) and their needs, in its response to the problem of HIV among migrant groups.

17: UNAIDS Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

Decisions6 April 2012 by Amy Coulterman[PDF][print]

The PCB requested that the Secretariat report annually on progress made in the further development and implementation of the Monitoring and Evaluation Plan as a part of the Executive Director’s Report to the PCB.

16: UNAIDS Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

Decisions6 April 2012 by Amy Coulterman[PDF][print]

The PCB encouraged national governments to strengthen their monitoring and evaluation efforts and to intensify collaboration with the UNAIDS Cosponsors and Secretariat in reporting regularly on the status and response to the global epidemic.

15: UNAIDS Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

Decisions6 April 2012 by Amy Coulterman[PDF][print]

The PCB encouraged the Cosponsors to strengthen the internal monitoring and evaluation of their HIV/AIDS related programmes. The PCB further requested the Secretariat to work closely with the Cosponsors to coordinate their internal, external and joint monitoring and evaluation efforts on HIV/AIDS, emphasizing a common framework, formats and indicators.

14: UNAIDS Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

Decisions6 April 2012 by Amy Coulterman[PDF][print]

The PCB encouraged its Members to raise within the governing boards of the Cosponsors the need for further commitment to their individual and collective responsibilities in the response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic, emphasizing the clarification of roles and responsibilities required to improve accountability for programme performance and implementation.

13: UNAIDS Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

Decisions6 April 2012 by Amy Coulterman[PDF][print]

The PCB noted with appreciation the decision of the CCO to complete UN System Integrated Workplans in all countries through the Theme Group Mechanism by the year 2000. The PCB requested that the CCO directly monitor progress in completing these workplans and to regularly report to the PCB on this key benchmark of interagency collaboration at country level.

12: UNAIDS Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

Decisions6 April 2012 by Amy Coulterman[PDF][print]

The PCB requested an intensification of current efforts to develop the UN System Integrated Workplan and Budget for the 2000-2001 biennium at the global and regional levels in order to further define the responsibilities of the UNAIDS Cosponsors and Secretariat, including their monitoring and evaluation responsibilities.

11: UNAIDS Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

Decisions6 April 2012 by Amy Coulterman[PDF][print]

The PCB requested that the Secretariat and Cosponsors continue to collaborate in the further development of the plan, taking into consideration the need for:

  • further distinction of those efforts focussed on the monitoring and evaluation of the global response to HIV/AIDS from that of the performance of the UNAIDS Cosponsors and Secretariat;
  • closer linkage with the UN Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) including attention to the relationships between HIV/AIDS and development policy and programme efforts;

10: UNAIDS Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

Decisions6 April 2012 by Amy Coulterman[PDF][print]

The PCB endorsed the approach and priorities described within the Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (UNAIDS/PCB(7)/98.4), welcoming the emphasis within the plan on the further elaboration of the specific roles and responsibilities of the Secretariat and the Cosponsors. The PCB further urged the Secretariat and the Cosponsors to accelerate the implementation of the plan, including initiating global monitoring at each of the four levels of the logical framework, using the best available indicators.

9: Young people and HIV/AIDS: Strategic framework

Decisions6 April 2012 by Amy Coulterman[PDF][print]

The points in attachment 1 were recommended by the PCB working groups to be taken into consideration in the development of the strategy paper.

8: Young people and HIV/AIDS: Strategic framework

Decisions6 April 2012 by Amy Coulterman[PDF][print]

As a powerful advocacy tool, the strategy should be presented to the governing boards of the Cosponsors and other relevant UN agencies. Members have a responsibility to advocate within these governing boards for appropriate action.

7.6: Young people and HIV/AIDS: Strategic framework

Decisions6 April 2012 by Amy Coulterman[PDF][print]

The development of indicators should occur simultaneously with that of the strategy.

7.5: Young people and HIV/AIDS: Strategic framework

Decisions6 April 2012 by Amy Coulterman[PDF][print]

The strategy development should be completed and reported to the PCB within one year.

7.4: Young people and HIV/AIDS: Strategic framework

Decisions6 April 2012 by Amy Coulterman[PDF][print]

The PCB and its members have different and important roles in the strategic development process:

  • country level consultations with young people should be carried out through the Theme Groups and other appropriate consultative mechanisms, in particular in countries of PCB members (with a view to reporting back to the next PCB meeting);
  • the collection of background information and the preparation of the working draft should be undertaken by the Cosponsors and the Secretariat.

Page 1 of 212
Representing Civil Society on the UNAIDS Programme Coordinating Board